
11-03-2007, 10:14 PM
|
| Junior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 8
| |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Open Mind I think the choice of dogs to test psi, is preferable in some ways. They don't get nervous about being tested or worry about failing......... but best of all magician debunkers will be less inclines to imagine hotdog reading or elaborate slight of paw techniques.
If the experimental protocol produces no psi, the debunkers will applaud the excellent protocol and add your results to skeptic dictionaries.
If successful, the skeptics will ignore or demand greater controls. To satisfy this, the dogs will end up blindfolded, wearing earphones with loud white noise, blocked nostrils and placed in an isolated room to walk up to TV screen instead of window. Of course the dog onwer will be replaced for possibly training the dog to cheat and replaced with a stranger. If that doesn't put the dog psi completely off quite enough, medical examinations to look for internal walkie-talkies should work
When the experiment eventually fails, the debunker will finally agree, at last you have a most excellent protocol.
(Hey who said only die-hard skeptics were cynical? Not true!  ) |  HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. BRAVO! |