View Single Post
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2007, 12:16 PM
alextsakiris alextsakiris is offline
Skeptiko.com poscast host
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phronk View Post
I don't think it's as simple as it appears at first. In your example, the dog could communicate through non-telepathic means. Either unintentionally - e.g., a tendency to nod his head after seeing a wavy line symbol that the communicator picks up on subconsciously - or intentionally - e.g., training the dog to nod his head after seeing a wavy line symbol.

A good rule of thumb is that if a human could easily accomplish a task through normal means, it won't prove anything paranormal if a dog performs the same task. Anyone who has had a dog knows how smart they are, especially when their goal is to please their owner.

Maybe if the communicator was blocked from normal sensory communication with the dog, this would be tighter. Or do the opposite; train the dog to point out what symbol the communicator is thinking of while looking at him through a one-way mirror (in a soundproof shielded room, etc.).
Something like this has been done with a Parrott: Nkisi Project
Reply With Quote