Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudism  It was a good idea, but seemingly flawed in execution and analysis. I think it would be another good area for OpenSourceScience to design an experiment without so many obvious problems for us skeptics to point out after the fact (ideally one where it is not necessary to throw out 40% of the data and do wonky statistical gymnastics in order to get significance in concordance with a telepathy hypothesis). |
Here's Sheldrake's reply:
N'kisi: Robert Todd Carroll replies to Rupert Sheldrake
Also, I like how Carroll (philosophy teacher at Sacramento City Junior College) labels every mention of his name an ad hominem attack... laughable.