[Paul C. Anagnostopoulos]

Originally Posted by Larry Boy

A therapist should be neutral, in my opinion, neither dismissing nor endorsing the past life memory claims of his patients. His job is to help the patient deal with whatever problems he has, not to decide whether reincarnation is a possibility or not. That's for scientists to investigate. And of course, the therapist shouldn't speculate about memories implanted by "our overlord denizens of the hollow earth", but surely that's not what we're discussing here?

I'm just trying to figure out why people think past life regression is reasonable, whereas my list of other things people believe (e.g., ghosts, aliens) is not.

So we should invent criteria for deciding what is possible and not prior to investigating claims? Evidence isn't what we should base our judgments on then?

I agree wholeheartedly. So why are people laughing at my list of other things?

~~ Paul