Quote:
Originally Posted by skidoo Good grief. Did you miss my previous message where I shot this down by adding a built-in DVD player to the TV set? |
So a person with a DVD player attached to a TV set, proves TV programmes are not being broadcast?

You and Novella are the ones confidently stating evidence exists by implying correlations means causations.
Quote:
|
the materialist position is supported by ever increasing MOUNTAINS of evidence,
|
Give me the evidence. I think you are making mountains out of sand castles
Quote:
|
then the reasonable default position is that the TV set has a built-in DVD player. Any other non-falsifiable hypotheses are unnecessary.
|
Since there is no 'default position' outside mindsets, hypotheses are necessary. If information (e.g. like telepathy, remote viewing, etc.) is shared with another TV set (mind-brain interaction) , it suggests something invisible is occurring outside the TV set.
As for claiming 'non-falsifiable', I would abandon the dualist argument *if* a few on the list I supplied was falsified. My position is falsifiable but is yours? You are seem to be arguing anything, by default, must be assumed to be only physical therefore anything non-physical must be assumed false by default ...therefore anything non-physical causing physical effects is judged false until some physical cause is found .... this is a non-falsifiable physicalists stance. Tell me what would falsify physicalism for you?
Quote:
|
Right. And until every last transitional fossil is found, and every mechanism of evolution explained, the creationists are more likely to be correct. Come on.
|
Strawman. I am not religious, not a creationist.