Quote:
Originally Posted by David Bailey  I don't think that is fair. Alex does add his own commentary after the interviews are complete, which is maybe a bit 'unfair', but he is simply trying to relate all the things that they have said to try to get some sense out of a very muddy area.
I think if anyone goes on his show they would be very well advised to have their facts right and to have carefully read any papers that they want to criticise - but what is wrong with that?
Any skeptics that don't research their facts properly, are likely to make themselves sound fairly silly: Dialogues and Controversies - Controversies - The Telepathy Debate
David |
I would add that I'm always willing to have any guest come back on and correct any mistakes, or misrepresentations I may have made.
Steve Novella did this... at least one time, but after I pointed out the obvious mistakes he and Wiseman made the conversation kinda died out.
Why???
Because Skepitcs love to dish it out, but they can't take it.