Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul C. Anagnostopoulos  Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
You can't do the same with morphic resonance. There is no way to manipualte it. There is no way to transparently make predictions from morphic resonance.
| Hell, you can't even say which objects are associated with morphic resonance and which are not. |
Guys I've just suggested an placebo VS placebo experiment above that could monitor the effects....
'....testing a placebo 1 against a placebo 2 however tell the medical researchers performing single blind experiment that one of these is an esteemed drug with excellent results in prior (invented) trials, monitor the results. Then do double blind later, if the effect continues in the double blind stage, that is impossible in current scientific paradigm? ...
The prediction would be the highly esteemed placebo beats the normal placebo in single blind, continues to work better than the non-esteemed placebo in double blind trials ......until researchers find out the drug was a placebo then, then the esteemed placebo decreases.
If that occurs, only something like Sheldrake's formative causation could explain it IMHO