Quote:
Originally Posted by David Bailey  I think it is interesting to compare past scientific revolutions with a conceivable future ? revolution. There are some interesting points to remember |
This is just a version of the Galileo gambit. Radin and Sheldrake are not Einstein or Newton.
Quote:
|
A physical theory that included ? (which perhaps simply means including consciousness) will probably look superficially very different to what exists at the moment, but it will predict essentially the same outcome for traditional experiments, but suggest new possibilities, just as every previous change of scientific paradigm has. |
In a previous post you said that "psi" is communication through non-physical means. How can that be included in a physical theory? You just want to have your supernatural woo and eat it too.