View Single Post
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2008, 06:09 PM
Paul C. Anagnostopoulos Paul C. Anagnostopoulos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,020
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David
Clearly, people like Ian and I want 'free will' to mean essentially what 99% of humanity mean by this phrase. By that understanding, nothing that is equivalent to a mechanism can possess free will. Your materialist viewpoint means that you think it is appropriate to subtly change the meaning of free will - OK, fine, but why not admit that, and use a different term - pseudo-free will (PFW).
Come on David, this is nonsense. First of all, you have no idea what 99% of humanity pictures when they think of free will. Secondly, I'm not trying to change the meaning of the term. There already are a spectrum of meanings: libertarian free will, incompatibilist free will, compatibilist free will. I've been very careful to try to get you to specify which one you are talking about.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Can 99% of humanity clearly define what they mean when they say "free will"?
Witness this conversation.

~~ Paul
Reply With Quote