View Single Post
  #80 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2008, 07:50 AM
Open Mind Open Mind is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul C. Anagnostopoulos View Post
I don't need to define this term [free will] because I do not claim that I have it.
How sad, poor Paul doesn't have any free will ....... perhaps I can help you .....just use your free will to become a dualist. Paul it is not compulsory or written in the origin of the universe that Paul must be a materialist monist, you can use your free will and change opinion

Then most of the hard philosophical problems of free will dissolve.

Quote:
Various compatibilist definitions are required in ethics and the law, but those would have to be defined based on a list of factors that were not present when the decision was made. These factors would be things like heavy coercion or brainwashing. This is a practical definition, not a philosophical one.
So you are saying we are Pinocchio puppets without control of our strings? How did a sense of 'conscience' evolve via natural selection? If, as you are suggesting, that actions are always based upon prior conditioning, what is the evolutionary advantage of 'conscience' unless we have a degree of free will?..... tell me how it evolved....or do I hear the sound of crickets?

Last edited by Open Mind; 04-28-2008 at 07:57 AM..
Reply With Quote