View Single Post
  #91 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2008, 07:22 PM
Paul C. Anagnostopoulos Paul C. Anagnostopoulos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,020
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian
Skeptics are constantly insinuating that the failure of anyone to win the challenge gives a good prima facie reason to suppose that no paranormal phenomena exists.
I agree. It is a good prima facie reason. It's just not anything like proof.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry
It claims to be "research" that is "utilizing 'the scientific method'."
I'd say "research" is a slight exaggeration, but it is not a scientific study.

Quote:
That's not where the problem lies! The problem is that a lot of skeptics have the attitude that unless somebody wins the challenge, all scientific evidence of psi is useless! What kind of reasoning is that? Why should one publicity-seeking challenge be more important than over 60 years of scientific research by hundreds of scientists?
Well, that's a bad attitude. My attitude is more like the paranormal mongers should shut the hell up and take the challenge.

~~ Paul
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links - register to remove ads