Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ian Replace the concept of a little man in us by a self -- a non-physical self. Then we don't get any such absurdity, we just have a two-term relationship. Of course proposing such a self means it lies outside the scope of science, but that has always been my precise position. |
Why don't we get exactly the same absurdity?
And could you explain the absurdity in more detail, please? Why does the little man need a littler man inside? It's not as if our self-awareness is infinitely nested. For example, we have no experience of how we actually think.
~~ Paul