Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Noble  I agree totally but I don't see Ian or David rushing to overwhelm me with supporting data.
I am perfectly willing to come to the table and support the modest claims that I have made. I am not going to play a silly game where the entire burden is shifted to me.
Quit your silly whining about Skeptics. |
You are totally right of course. It
is silly of me to point out when Skeptics are irrational, nonscientific and anti-skeptical (or, for that matter, rude). After all, Skeptics are the embodiment-in-flesh of Truth, and as such do not have to follow any of the rules of logic, evidence, rationality or non-fallacious argument. It's not as if those are ways at
arriving at the truth (what would the point of
that be since the truth is self-evident to any Skeptic, and one merely has to ask one, whatever actual knowledge they might have on the subject, to have an absolute and unquestionable answer) those are weapons to be used in smiting the unbelievers.
