Hi, I'm new.
The problem with meta analysis of psi experiments is we don't really know the quality of those experiments.
The post Hyman Honorton communique ganzfeld seemed to have solved that (significant 31% hit rate from 86 to 99) but upon the introduction of stricter standards in 2000 the hit rates declined to a non significant 27%. Radin is a sharp guy but I don't think the evidence is as robust as he seems too.
what we need is a repeatable experiment, not excuses why we can't find one. I think the best bets right now are:
1. dogs that know
2. medium trials
3. staring experiments
4. telephone telepathy |