Ok, got round to reading:
Vandegrift, G. (1995). Bell's theorem and psychic phenomena. The Philosophical Quarterly, 45 (181), 471-476
As I suspected, I don't really understand it. It's quite short so maybe I'll keep trying. However, just to annoy everyone (
) I'll post the conclusion. If you want to know who Vandegrift is, he's Assistent Professor in Physics at Wright State University.
"Conclusion.
Bells theorem is truly astonishing, more astonishing than the rest of quantum mechanics, which makes bizarre predictions about small objects. According to quantum mechanics, large objects also display this bizarre behaviour, but to a much lesser extent. For example, the uncertainty principle predicts that it is possible for someone to be suddenly and mysteriously transported to a high mountain in Tibet, only to return just as mysteriously. However, a simple estimate indicates that the probability of anyone's being transported a significant distance is so remote that it will never happen in the age of the universe. In other words, most of the bizarre quantum behaviour attributed to particles is due to the fact that they are so tiny.
On the other hand there seems to be no fundamental reason why two people could not put themselves into what might be called a "degenerate-mixed-energy-state" and reproduce what Harry and Sally have done here. I did not intend to write an essay of psychic phenomena and made this analogy because it is the most direct description of what the EPR experiment is actually doing. I do not believe in mental telepathy, miracles and any other occult phenomenon. This affair with Bell's theorem has shaken me to the bone."