Quote:
Originally Posted by SkepticalBry  Mcromer: If you want to really challenge skeptics, you'll need to claim something paranormal, and you'll need to write clearly. Your "challenge" rules here do not make sense. Beyond the basic issues of coherent writing, if you want to "draw media attention to consciousness survival research" you might try demonstrating a result showing survival of consciousness. What have you got?
-Bryan |
His challenge rules are crystal clear.
He doesn't need to demonstrate survival of consciousness. His attempt
to acquire information through other means than his five senses is
good enough. His rules basically rule out cold reading and leave us
to consider a paranormal explanation.
Once people see this being done, then we can move onto whether or
not this is evidence of survival of consciousness. And that seems to be Marcel's goal. And this challenge will introduce more people to the subject and get the debate going.
IMO...