Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Chinese Plant Compound Wipes out Cancer in 40 Days

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Chinese Plant Compound Wipes out Cancer in 40 Days

    Chinese Plant Compound Wipes out Cancer in 40 Days, Says New Research

    A little-known plant with a truly bizarre name is now making headlines as a cancer killer, with the compound of the plant vanishing tumors in mice with pancreatic cancer. Known as the ‘thunder god vine’ or lei gong teng, the Chinese plant is actually integrated into Chinese medicine and has been used for ages in remedying a number of conditions including rheumatoid arthritis.

    According to the new research out of the University of Minnesota’s Masonic Cancer Center, the thunder god plant compound led to no signs of tumors after a 40 day period — even after discontinuing the treatment. Published in the journal Science Translational Medicine and funded by the National Institutes of Health, even the scientists working on the project were stunned by the anti-cancer properties of the compound. Known to contain something known as triptolide, which has been identified as a cancer fighter in previous research, it is thought to be the key component that may be responsible for the anti-tumor capabilities.

    Study leader and vice chairman of research at the Cancer Center explained to Bloomberg how he was blown away by the effects of the simple plant:

    “This drug is just unbelievably potent in killing tumor cells,” he said.

    And just like with numerous other powerful substances like turmeric and ginger, mainstream science is still slowly confirming what many traditional practitioners have known for their entire lives. This is, of course, due to the fact that there is simply no money for major corporations in researching the healing powers of natural herbs and compounds such as the compound found in the thunder god vine. Turmeric and ginger, for example, have been found to be amazing anti-cancer substances that are virtually free compared to expensive and dangerous cancer drugs.

    Nevertheless, the Big Pharma sponsored corporate scientists have managed to ignore these spices as much as possible. In fact, they have even been caught time and time again faking thousands of studies to fraudulently demonstrate the supposed value of pharmaceutical drugs pushed by major pharma juggernauts — many of which are later forced to pay millions in fines which only slightly stack up against their billions in profits.

    Profits that are threatened by the many real studies that were performed by scientists examining the rejeuvenating power of cheap ingredients like turmeric, which has been found by peer-reviewed research available on PubMed to positively influence over 590 conditions.

    While it is great news that this study is bringing the beneficial effects of inexpensive and near-free plant compounds to light, the bad news is that the individuals responsible for the research are actually looking to create a pharmaceutical drug from the essential component triptolide. A drug that will seek FDA approval and ultimately be patented, nutritionally ruined, and sold for exorbitant amounts of cash. Instead, just get your hands on some thunder god vine for yourself.

    Read more: Chinese Plant Compound Wipes Out Cancer in 40 Days Says New Research

  • #2
    Here is a summary of the abstract of the research paper, the article is based on.

    To really understand what the researchers did and found, one should really read the full paper.

    But in the abstract there are two important points.

    1) The active substance in the plant (triptolide) had to be chemically modified in order to be absorbed into the body. Eating the plant is not enough to make the substance reach the cancer.

    2) The study was done on experimental mice, where cultured cancer cells had been implanted, or their genes had been modified to make them develop pancreas cancer spontaneously.

    Such studies are useful for selecting drugs that may be worthwhile testing in humans, but they do not predict anything about the efficacy of the drug in humans.

    Comment


    • #3
      They can't have it both ways they say that if it works in animals it will not work in humans what a lot of BS
      If it will not work in humans then why even test in animals first?
      First they know it will work in humans if it works in animals but it will never get that far because it would destroy a billion dollar business. They make it next to impossible for any non drug to get to market.
      There is natural path doctors who use knowledge taken from veterinarians and used it on people with very high success rate. There has been hundreds of cancer cures that the doctors had to leave the country to practice because the drug cartel.

      Comment


      • #4
        No - The rationale is this:

        1) If it does not work in a mouse, it is unlikely to work in a human, and therefore not worth spending money on further development.

        2) If it works in a mouse, it may work in a human. If the mouse experiment makes it look very promising, this may become a possible money spinner.

        Anyone who came up with a cure wouldn't lose money. They would become stinking rich. We know this because there are people who make a living out of selling false hopes to sick people. See for instance Joe Mercola: Proof positive that quackery sells ? Respectful Insolence It is scumbags like that who often start such conspiracy rumours, and then explain that they have (and sell) the cure. It wouldn't surprise me one bit, if you found your conspiracy theory on such a quack site.

        On the internet there are many claims of miraculous "natural" cancer cures that are being suppressed. Here some of them are listed, with links to sites explaining what is wrong with them: Suppressed by Scientists and Big Pharma: The Hidden Cancer Cure? But Which One?? | Anaximperator blog

        It is a shame that people who are dedicated to improve outlooks of cancer patients are being met with contempt because of belief in such lunacy: Why I'm feeling so crabby about cancer conspiracy theories | Cath Ennis | Science | theguardian.com

        Comment


        • #5
          You can easily see that these web sites are set up to do a hatchet job on all alternative medicine. I think people are now not so easily fooled. The medical monopoly can spend billions of dollars giving out miss information. If you are a follower of alternative medicine you have seen this conspiracy. Some of the websites like webmd and quackwatch are founded by big pharma so what do you expect. Big pharma does not want to lose it's cash cow.
          There is other web sites that are more honest Educate-Yourself - Forbidden Cures

          Comment


          • #6
            There's no "miracle cancer cure".
            And yes big pharma has no interest in cancer being "cured". Chemo(s) are amounting for more money you could imagine.
            The breakthrough won't come either from the drug industry or a "miracle" herb.
            Drugs (plants do count as drugs, as drugs are actually made out of plants) can't overcome cancer by themselves.
            There's only immunotherapy that could do the trick once and for all. But pharma lobbies have no interest in this kind of cure, because there's not so much money to suck out of the patients purses with this approach. Cancer clearance would lead to a drop in the money income. These pharma b*** are better off selling drugs (chemo) that are only half effective and which action would only extend the life of the sick by a few months... and make them longer living drug consumers.
            The pharmaceutical industry, you gotta hate it... But I don't really see this chinese plant being that much more intersting. Seems to be just another side of the cancer trade.

            Comment


            • #7
              Regarding the POLIO vaccine

              On the question who owned the patent and how much money they were going to make, Jonas Sulk uttered this meaning ; "-There is no patent. Could you patent the sun?"

              That would have the stockbrokers, shady-investers . go apeshit and the rest of Wall Street ripping their eyes out of their sockets: "One does not just GIVE something like that away" "I'ts goddamn communism" " Curse the boy"

              These days I am pretty sure there is a set of laws in motion that prevent people like Salk giving something to humanity. free of charge.
              Last edited by Pollux; August 24th, 2013, 09:52 AM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Plato's Cavern View Post
                And yes big pharma has no interest in cancer being "cured". Chemo(s) are amounting for more money you could imagine.
                As explained above:
                Anyone who came up with a cure wouldn't lose money. They would become stinking rich.
                There's only immunotherapy that could do the trick once and for all. But pharma lobbies have no interest in this kind of cure, because there's not so much money to suck out of the patients purses with this approach.
                Immunotherapy is in use in conventional cancer treatment. But it is not an easy-to-do-cure-of-all-cancers.
                The pharmaceutical industry, you gotta hate it...
                It certainly is a demonstrable fact that they have exhibited a lot of unethical behaviour for profit. But it is also a demonstrable fact, that cancer treatments have improved considerably over the years - and I don't see how this could have been achieved without the help of the pharmaceutical industry.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by JLI View Post
                  As explained above:

                  Immunotherapy is in use in conventional cancer treatment. But it is not an easy-to-do-cure-of-all-cancers.
                  It's the only asset we have, if we are to erradicate this scourge once and for all. Certain protocols have shown incredible power against at least 90% of cancers. The research on the MUC1 protein, for example, looks very promising, and the cure would have a vaccine-like shape.
                  And no Sir, a one-shot cure would not amount even closely for the money chemo industry does.
                  Alas, the labs responsible for such cure lines have a very hard time coming through and finding funding. Why is that? Oh yeah why?
                  Believe me, I've worked as a junior oncologist in a internal medicine dept, I know what I'm talking about here.
                  Last edited by Plato's Cavern; August 31st, 2013, 12:35 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by JLI View Post
                    Ahat cancer treatments have improved considerably over the years - and I don't see how this could have been achieved without the help of the pharmaceutical industry.
                    No they haven't improved that much, if we consider complete remission. Child tumors are the ones which have really improved, along with a few liquid cancers (Hodgkin, some leukemia type...), testicle cancer, and that's about it. Adenocarinomas and sarcomas (95% of all cancers) are still pretty much untreatable when they achieve the critical mass of a billion cells and begin to spread. In the 80s we finally achieved the 50% rate of cancer cleareance out of 100% cases (which means 50% patients still dying overall). Now, the mark is a tad higher, but just a tad. What's going on is people living LONGER with the disease, paying LONGER for their chemo, SUFFERING longer too on the physical and the psychological planes alike.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      If we would have given the billions of dollars to the Naturopath instead of the drug companies that make money off you being sick. The cure would have been made a long time ago. After the billions of dollars given to the medical system. US still is highest in obesity and very high in cancer, diabetes, arthritis, and the list goes on. The US spends more money than all other countries in the world put together and what did we get the sickest people. If you think they are looking for a cure think again. If alternative medicine found a cure they would stop you from learning about it.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I'm not buying this

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X