MegaChi pendant and other cellular radiation protectors (Blog)

[jacob]

Discuss here the following article from mind-energy.net blog.


Click here to view the article.

[jacob]

Do you think "any" device can possible eliminate the negative effects of cellular radiation (if they indeed are negative).

[Topher Cooper]

You argue -- correctly, I think -- that the pendant cannot possibly block the cell phone radiation. That's not what the ad, as reproduced by you, says it does, though. It says that it blocks the negative effects on your DNA, and even reverses existing damage. This implies that its effect is to heal the damage as quickly as it occurs -- or more quickly to reverse the effect.

This means, assuming that it heals the whole body and doesn't need to be applied to the point of damage, that wearing it around the neck is fine, and that there is no need to block the radiation coming from your cell phone.

This doesn't mean, though, that this is real. It seems pure, classic talisman magic to me, even though they have described a controversial (though possibly real) modern "demon" against which it is to act. Personally, I don't believe in the efficacy of talismans except as placebos, and think the probability is very high that this is a pure scam, with almost all the remaining probability on self-delusion by the purveyors.

[jacob]

More specifically, somewhere on the site it says that it transforms the radiation into its harmonic parts or something of that sort.

I've heard of another similar devices claiming the same. Then I was told that it performs Fourier transform of the wave into its parts or something like that. I know that light can be filtered and a FT image be displayed on screen using special optical filters but I'm not sure it can heal the DNA or anything similar to that effect. Looks like a total scam to me.

Interesting, though, to know more about the research.

[RainCrow]

The first one I heard about was Q-link and it was advertised heavily several years ago on Jeff Rense' radio show. If you are not familiar with Jeff Rinse, he has a web site where you can listen to his show JeffRense.com. I had a Q-link pendant and wore it for a long time, but was never convinced it did anything.

The newest thing I have seen along this line is the Q-ray bracelet that is advertised to make you "feel better." Talk about vague! I am more savvy than I used to be and more skeptical, and I didn't bite. I think placebo is a fair guess about how it would help someone. I don't know anyone who has a Q-ray bracelet but I do know someone who has a Q-link pendant (the fancy, expensive version) and swears by it.

The whole gadget world is a bit too good to be true to my way of thinking. A friend of mine had an electrical thing (for about $500!) that you plug in and immerse in water and put your feet in with it for half an hour. The water turns an awful shade of greenish black - supposed to be impurities coming out of you. After you use it a while, the electrodes are completely corroded up and useless. I suspect that whatever electrochemical process caused the color change came from the electrodes and not the person's feet.

I believe in dowsing, because I think it comes from the dowser's subconscious mind which probably has some psychic connections to something in the zero point field. Perhaps muscle testing is rooted in the same process. But gadgets just don't do it for me.

[Indalo]

This may re-activate this rather old post. I am involved with (and interested in) good luck charms. These are carried/worn by people who 9 times out of 10 believe that it will make things better for them. This is perhaps what is behind everything mentioned so far. Many people carry one (in one form or another) - even famous people (eg: Napoleon, Washington, . . ). Anybody have any views on this??

[jacob]

Originally Posted by Indalo

This may re-activate this rather old post. I am involved with (and interested in) good luck charms. These are carried/worn by people who 9 times out of 10 believe that it will make things better for them. This is perhaps what is behind everything mentioned so far. Many people carry one (in one form or another) - even famous people (eg: Napoleon, Washington, . . ). Anybody have any views on this??

Obviously, if they would not believe in them, they would not wear them.

[anonymous]

Originally Posted by Indalo

This may re-activate this rather old post. I am involved with (and interested in) good luck charms. These are carried/worn by people who 9 times out of 10 believe that it will make things better for them. This is perhaps what is behind everything mentioned so far. Many people carry one (in one form or another) - even famous people (eg: Napoleon, Washington, . . ). Anybody have any views on this??

I think there is a type of psychological phenomena where people make associations that are not really rational and they know it isn't rational but they still feel a compulsion about it. Like if an athlete does really well wearing a certain shirt he might come to think of it as a lucky shirt. He might rationally know that it is just coincidence but because of the way the nervous system works he still feels that he has to wear it. This might be realted to obsessive compulsive disorder.

I don't really know about the statistics but I think it is possible for people to feel that some object is necessary to prevent bad luck or cause good luck but not really believe in it.

It is like other superstitions. Does walking under a ladder cause bad luck? Some people would say no but still avoid walking under a ladder. This is an "irrational fear". It is not caused by belief or reason but the fear is real.

The brain is a conglomeration of different functional centers. Some behaviors may be learned by the primitive part of the brain eventhough the more advanced intellectual part of the brain wants nothing to do with it.

[caoxueer1r]

For any given task in Britain there are more men than are needed. Strong unions keep them there in

Fleet Street, home of some London’s biggest dailies, it is understood that when two unions quarrel

over three jobs, the argument is settled by giving each union two. Thru means 33 per cent over

manning, 33 per cent less productivity than could be obtained.
A reporter who has visited plants throughout Europe has an impression that the pace of work is much

slower here. Nobody tries tm hard. Tea breaks do matter and are frequent. It is hard to measure

intensity of work, but Britons give a distinct impression of going at their tasks in a more leisurely

way.wow power leveling,
But is all this so terrible? It certainly does not improve the gross national product or output per

worker. Those observant visitors, however, have noticed something else about Britain. It is a pleasant

place.
Street crowds in Stockholm. Paris and New York move quickly and silently heads down, all in a hurry.

London crowds tend to walk at an easy pace (except in the profitable, efficient City, the financial

district).
world of warcraft power leveling,
Every stranger is struck by the patient and orderly way in which Britons queue for a bus; if the

saleswoman is slow and out of stock she will likely say,‘oh dear, what a pity’; the rubbish

collectors stop to chat and call the housewives“Luv”. Crime rises here as in every city but there

still remains a gentle tone and temper that is unmatched in Berlin, Milan or Detroit.It short, what is

wrong with Britain may also be what is right. Having reached a tolerable standard, Britons appear to

be choosing leisure over goods.56. What happens when disputes over job opportunities arise among

British unions?A) Thirty-three per cent of the workers will be out of workB) More people will be

employed than necessaryC) More jobs will be created by the governmentD) The unions will try to

increase productivity.57.

What does the reporter who has visited plants throughout Europe think about Britain?A) Tea breaks do

not affect the intensity of work in BritainB) Britons do their work in an unhurried sort of wayC) The

pace of work in Continental Europe is much slower than in BritainD) Britons give the impression of

working intensively58.“The breaks do matter” ( Para.2 Line 2) indicates tha they are an important

aspect of the British way of lifeB) they are greatly enjoyed by British workersC) they can be used by

the workers as excuse to take time off from workD) they help the workers to be on good terms with each

other59. The word“this” (Para.3 Line.1) refers
age of conan power

leveling,to the fact tha there are more men on any given job than are neededB) 33 per cent over

manning leads to 33 per cent less productivityC) it is difficult to measure the intensity of workD)

Britons generally do not want to work too hard60. By“what is wrong with Britain may also be what is

right” (Para.6, Line.1) the author means to say tha quarrels between unions will help create jobsB) a

leisurely way of life helps Britons increase productivityC) the gentle tone and temper of the people

in Britain makes it a pleasant placeD) Britons will not sacrifice their leisure to further in crease

productivityPassage

Street crowds in Stockholm.