Parapsychology and alternative medicine forum

Part of parapsychology articles and blog


Go Back   Parapsychology and alternative medicine forums of mind-energy.net > Parapsychology and psi abilties > Skeptiko Podcast

Skeptiko Podcast The Official discussions forum of skeptiko.com podcast

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2010, 07:23 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 162
Default A new Bodhisavatta?

Ram Bahadur Bomjon, for those of you who don't know who he is: Ram Bahadur Bomjon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As should be clear from the article, Ram doesn't claim to be the Buddha reincarnated, but he does say that he isn't. He is called Buddha Boy because of events in his life that resemble events in the life of the last Buddha. Also, it is important to know that the word "Buddha" describes a state of raised consciousness, and is used as an honorific title, as opposed to belonging to a single person. This means it is incorrect to say that anyone is a reincarnation of "the" Buddha", because more than one person has been honored with this name/title/rank.

The part of the Bomjon story that I think is most relevant here is the strange skeptical reaction to it. There are a number of theories running around about how Bomjon and his followers have tricked people with some kind of magician/fakir-inspired stunt, yet these propositions, to the extent they can be checked, are quite wide of the mark.

First, the most controversial aspect of Bomjon's notoriety is that he didn't eat or drink while meditating for many months under a pipal tree. This is likely the most controversial because according to modern medical science, it is impossible for a human body to survive for such a period of time without food or water.

Skeptics claim that he did somehow manage to feed himself and drink water. The claim is supported by the fact that people who wanted to test Bomjon were kept some distance from the tree he meditated under, and that at night it was difficult to observe him. Some people wanted him set up in a sterile environment where he could be carefully observed, just as another Buddhist monk, an old man featured on a Discovery channel documentary about Bomjon: YouTube - Documentary About Buddha Boy (1 of 5) Ram Bahadur Bamjan (might be the wrong one, but I think it's in there. Either way, it's interesting) did do, in full view of many scientists. That monk was continuously observed, day and night, for ten days or so. He did not drink, eat, or visit a bathroom the entire time. All by itself, that example puts a dent in the idea that it is impossible to live for more than four days without water.

Bomjon supposedly did it for more than ten months. The magnitude of such a feat, if true, is that it completely changes many basic assumptions of biological science. For this reason, skeptics have been especially vociferous in their demands for proof from Bomjon. Unfortunately for the skeptics, his meditation is what is important to him, not performing to satisfy the curiosity of strangers. He has repeatedly made statements to this effect, and that he doesn't like the crowds who have discovered his meditation spot. It is for this reason that he mysteriously vanished, and meditated deeper in a jungle.

If his goal was commercial enterprise of local fame, his attitude doesn't match well, unless he is a far more shrewd, calculating, and patient man than he appears to be. Also, regardless of whether he did or did not go without water for ten + months (the longest period of continuous observation was four days), he was observed meditating in the same position for ten months, regardless of weather and other conditions. That is an amazing feat all its own, and worthy of amazement from anyone who understands how difficult it is to sit still for as little as an hour without fidgeting. He was never observed in any location other than the pipal tree during the initial meditation period, at least not by any witnesses who have come forward, nor was any sign of deception ever found.

Ideas for how a deception could have been accomplished are not lacking, but no evidence for them has come to light.

According to my study of Yoga, the siddhis (minor psi effects) that occur as a part of yogic practice are not very important, but a side effect of a process that is important, a process very similar to what Bomjon is attempting, to improve his knowledge of himself and his surroundings through meditation, and then to improve conditions by the beneficent application of mental effort. The siddhis are what get the most attention in psi research, ESP, mediumship, precognition, etc, but these are all minor things according to yogic and Buddhist traditions. Are they right? If so, is there a way to study what they think is important?

AP
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links - register to remove ads
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2010, 08:24 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 126
Default

In the Hermetic path we're also told that 'siddhis' are side effects; mind you there are a great many of them that people don't normally talk about.

Good book on that: "Future of the Body" by Murphy
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2010, 12:19 PM
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 383
Default

I've been following the story since 2005:

Articles about Buddha boy
__________________
Visit the Parapsychology blog
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links - register to remove ads
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

Ad Management by RedTyger