Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexander1304  Hello all,
Dr.Phillis is specialist in what is called "Sacred Geometries".He is physicist (Ph.D) and seems to devote whole his life to demonstrate connection between "sacred geometries" of various traditions and modern science,especially superstring theories of physics.His latest book is titled "Mathematical coonection between religion and science".
Here is his website: Sacred Geometries & Their Scientific Meaning
From this article in his website ( Article 2)
it also follows that he is literal believer in Theosophy.
What do you guys think?
My point is: if he is right then,well...he should be considered one the most brilliant minids,and moreover,all our science,especially physics should be reconsidered,and be viewed from the point of "sacred geometries".Or,may be he is totally wrong.Who knows?....
What do you think?... |
I looked through the article. It's pseudo science - no formal mathematical proofs - he just tries to make it look like this. Also look at the references - all new age stuff:
The Secret Doctrine (5th (Adyar) ed.), H.P. Blavatsky (Theosophical Publishing House, London, 1962);
2. Extra-sensory Perception of Quarks, Stephen M. Phillips (Theosophical Publishing House, Wheaton, Ill., U.S.A., 1980);
3. Anima: Remote Viewing of Subatomic Particles, Stephen M. Phillips (Theosophical Publishing House, Adyar, Chennai, India, 1996);
4. ESP of Quarks and Superstrings, Stephen M. Phillips (New Age International, New Delhi, India, 1999);
5. Occult Chemistry, Annie Besant and C.W. Leadbeater (1st ed., 1908; 2nd ed., 1919; 3rd ed., 1951; reprinted 3rd ed., 1994);
6. My investigations in 1992 with a Canadian Buddhist claiming micro-psi ability indicate that these bubbles are actually torus-shaped, not spherical. Leadbeater failed to notice diametrically opposed, minute openings in their surfaces, creating vortex motion around a ring (see: “A Report on Recent Clairvoyant Observations of Subatomic Particles,” Stephen M. Phillips (unpublished));
7. For example: “Differences in Theosophical Teachings,” by G.A. Farthing (private publication);
8. “Heterotic and Type 1 string dynamics from eleven dimensions,” Petr Hořava and Edward Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 460 (1996), pp. 506–524;
9. “Superstrings in D=10 from supermembranes in D=11,” M.J. Duff, P.S. Howe, T. Inami and K.S Stelle, Phys. Lett. B, vol. 191, pp. 70–74; “Supermembranes and eleven-dimensional supergravity,” E. Bergshoeff, E. Sezgin and P.K. Townsend, Phys. Lett. B, vol. 189, pp. 7578;
10. However, not beyond that of the clairvoyant with whom I collaborated in 1992. Examining the analogous bubbles in electrons, which, being superstrings, are similar in some respects to UPAs, he reported finding himself in “a new kind of space,” which seemed featureless on cursory examination. He was evidently probing compactified dimensions of space beyond superstring space-time;
11. The Secret Doctrine, vol. 1, p. 78;
12. Transactions of the Blavatsky Lodge, vol. ii, p. 30;
13. The Secret Doctrine, vol. 1, pp. 295–296;
14. The Secret Doctrine, vol. 1, p. 296;
15. The Secret Doctrine, vol. 2, p. 778;
16. The Secret Doctrine, vol. 5, p. 475;
17. Reference 7;
18. “Physical and Superphysical,” E. Lester Smith, Research Centre Journal, 2nd Quarter, 1975;
19. Inner Adventures, E. Lester Smith (Theosophical Publishing House, Wheaton, Ill., U.S.A., 1988);
20. The Secret Doctrine, vol. 1, p. 78;
21. The Secret Doctrine, vol. 1, p. 196;
22. The Secret Doctrine, vol. 2, p. 181;
23. The Secret Doctrine, vol. 5, p. 521;
24. The Secret Doctrine, vol. 4, p. 165;
25. For example, see: “The shadow world of superstring theories,” E.W. Kolb, D. Seckel and M.S. Turner, Nature (London), vol. 314 (1985), pp. 415–419;
26. The Secret Doctrine, vol. 1, pp. 296, 302.
Did anybody hear/read about Dr. Stephen M.Phillips? 
Linear Mode
